AWS SageMaker vs Azure ML vs GCP Vertex AI: Which Should You Choose?

AWS SageMaker offers the broadest feature set and deepest AWS integration. Azure ML fits teams already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem with strong enterprise governance. GCP Vertex AI leads in managed AI services and tight integration with Google's open-source ML tools. Choose based on your existing cloud provider, team expertise, and whether your priority is flexibility, governance, or managed AI capabilities.

Quick Comparison

Key Differences

Ecosystem and integration

SageMaker integrates deeply with the broader AWS ecosystem - S3 for data, ECR for containers, IAM for access control, and Lambda for event-driven ML workflows. Azure ML connects natively with Azure DevOps, Power BI, Microsoft 365, and Azure Active Directory, making it a natural choice for enterprises already running on Microsoft infrastructure. Vertex AI is tightly coupled with BigQuery for data processing, Google Cloud Storage, and provides native support for TensorFlow, JAX, and Google's own foundation models through Model Garden.

MLOps and experiment management

All three platforms offer MLOps capabilities, but with different strengths. SageMaker provides Experiments for tracking, Pipelines for orchestration, Model Registry for versioning, and Model Monitor for drift detection. Azure ML includes a Responsible AI dashboard for model fairness and interpretability analysis, which is increasingly relevant for European companies subject to the EU AI Act. Vertex AI offers strong integration with open-source tools like Kubeflow and MLflow, along with built-in model monitoring and feature stores.

Managed model serving

SageMaker offers real-time endpoints, batch transform, and serverless inference options. Vertex AI provides similar capabilities with online and batch prediction endpoints, plus a unique Prediction Service that auto-scales based on traffic. Azure ML supports managed online endpoints with blue-green deployment and automatic scaling. For LLM serving specifically, SageMaker now supports vLLM and TensorRT-LLM on dedicated GPU instances, Vertex AI offers Model Garden with one-click deployment of popular open-source models, and Azure ML integrates with Azure OpenAI Service for GPT model access.

Pricing transparency

SageMaker and Azure ML both charge for compute instances by the hour, which can make cost prediction straightforward but expensive for experimentation. Vertex AI's pricing includes both compute hours and per-prediction charges for deployed models, which can be more economical for low-traffic endpoints but harder to forecast. All three offer spot/preemptible instances for training at 60-90% discounts.

When to Use AWS SageMaker

• Your organization runs primarily on AWS and you want ML infrastructure that integrates natively with existing S3, IAM, and VPC configurations.
• You need the broadest set of built-in ML features, from data labeling (Ground Truth) to edge deployment (SageMaker Edge).
• Your team prefers maximum flexibility in choosing frameworks, instance types, and deployment configurations.
• You have significant GPU inference needs and want access to the latest NVIDIA instances (p5, inf2) available on AWS.
• You're building custom training jobs and need granular control over distributed training across multiple GPU instances.

When to Use Azure ML

• Your enterprise is built on Microsoft technologies (Azure AD, DevOps, Power BI) and you want a unified identity and governance layer.
• Responsible AI and model interpretability are priorities, especially for meeting EU AI Act transparency requirements.
• Your data science team works heavily with .NET, C#, or integrates ML into Microsoft-ecosystem applications.
• You need hybrid ML capabilities that span Azure cloud and on-premises infrastructure through Azure Arc.
• Regulatory compliance requires strong audit trails, and Azure's enterprise compliance certifications (ISO, SOC, GDPR) fit your requirements.

When to Use GCP Vertex AI

• Your data pipeline already runs on BigQuery and Google Cloud, and you want seamless data-to-model workflows.
• Your team works primarily with TensorFlow, JAX, or wants access to Google's pre-trained models and AI APIs.
• You want managed AutoML capabilities for teams that need ML without deep framework expertise.
• You prefer a platform with strong Kubeflow integration for open-source MLOps compatibility.
• You need access to TPUs (Tensor Processing Units) for training workloads where TPUs offer cost-performance advantages over GPUs.

Can You Use More Than One?

Yes, though managing ML workloads across multiple cloud platforms adds operational complexity. Multi-cloud ML is most practical when teams standardize on portable tools like MLflow for experiment tracking, Kubeflow for orchestration, and ONNX for model format. Some European enterprises deliberately split workloads across providers for resilience or to avoid vendor lock-in. A practical approach is standardizing training on one platform while deploying inference endpoints on whichever cloud is closest to your end users or where your application already runs.

Not sure which ML platform fits your team?

EaseCloud helps companies evaluate and implement cloud ML platforms based on their existing infrastructure, team capabilities, and European data requirements.

→ Learn more about our AI/ML consulting services →